Varenicline shows promise, but cannabis treatment evidence remains mixed

Varenicline for the management of cannabis use disorder: A systematic review.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment β€’ β€’ Review β€’ Highly Relevant
πŸ€–

AI Summary

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is common, while existing psychosocial treatments provide only modest benefits and no medication is currently approved specifically for CUD. This systematic review examined varenicline, a nicotinic-receptor partial agonist approved for smoking cessation, as a possible treatment for cannabis use and withdrawal. The review included 5 studies involving 299 participants: 4 randomized controlled trials and one case series. Because the studies used methods that were too different, the authors conducted a narrative rather than statistical synthesis.

Results were mixed. The one study judged to be good quality found significant reductions in cannabis use and withdrawal symptoms, but the review concluded that the overall evidence remains insufficient for confident conclusions in adolescents or adults. Tolerability and effects on concurrent tobacco use were also inconsistent. In the higher-quality study, overall adverse-event rates did not differ between varenicline and placebo, although nausea was more common with varenicline. More research is needed before it can be considered a reliable treatment option for CUD.

πŸ’‘ Key Findings

1
The review found mixed evidence for varenicline as a treatment for cannabis use disorder across the included studies.
High
85%
2
The single good-quality study reported reduced cannabis use and withdrawal symptoms with varenicline.
Good
70%
3
Overall, there is insufficient evidence to draw confident conclusions about varenicline for CUD in adolescents and adults.
High
90%
4
In the higher-quality study, overall adverse events were similar between varenicline and placebo, but nausea was more frequent with varenicline.
Good
75%
5
Evidence about varenicline’s effect on concurrent tobacco use was inconsistent, with the higher-quality study finding no difference in cigarettes per day during treatment.
Good
75%

πŸ“„ Original Abstract

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is one of the highest prevalence mental health conditions globally. Psychosocial treatments for CUD have modest efficacy. There are currently no approved adjunctive pharmacological approaches for CUD. Varenicline, a nicotinic receptor partial agonist approved for use in smoking cessation, has shown promise as a treatment for CUD. This study aims to synthesise the literature on the efficacy of varenicline in treating CUD. A secondary aim is to examine the tolerability of varenicline and its effect on concurrent tobacco use within CUD treatment. A pre-registered systematic review of records extracted from Ovid MEDLINE ALL, CINAHL Complete, APA PsycInfo, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry, and Google Scholar (final extraction March 2025). Original peer-reviewed studies assessing the effect of varenicline on cannabis use or CUD in adolescents (13-18 years) or adults (18-65 years) were included. Risk of bias and study quality assessments were conducted. Five studies were identified as eligible for inclusion (total N = 299). Four studies were Randomized Controlled Trials and one was a case series. Two studies were assessed as poor quality, two as fair quality and one good quality. Narrative synthesis of studies was conducted because of lack of compatible study methodologies required for meta-analytic approaches. Mixed results were found on the efficacy of varenicline on cannabis use across studies. The single high-quality study demonstrated significant reductions in cannabis use and cannabis withdrawal symptoms. The three studies reporting on the secondary outcome of tolerability also demonstrated inconsistent findings. The high-quality study found no difference in participants experiencing at least one adverse event between the varenicline and placebo groups, however nausea was reported more frequently in the varenicline group. Inconsistent findings were observed across the four studies that measured concurrent tobacco use, with the one high-quality study reporting no differences in cigarettes per day over the treatment phase between the varenicline and placebo groups. There is currently insufficient data to draw confident conclusions about the efficacy and tolerability of varenicline as treatment for CUD in youth and adult populations.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.