Caregivers offer new insight into epilepsy trial participation

Exploring the caregiver journey through randomized controlled trials in dravet syndrome: insights from a cross-sectional survey.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B • • Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This cross-sectional survey explored how caregivers experienced their children’s participation in four randomized controlled trials for Dravet syndrome: studies of stiripentol, CBD, fenfluramine, and soticlestat. The survey included caregivers whose children had taken part in these trials between 1996 and 2024. In most cases, participation was suggested by the treating neurologist (39 of 44 caregivers; 88%). Families were often motivated by access to new treatments, hope, and trust in their medical team.

Caregivers who chose not to participate most often cited concerns about adverse events, the emotional strain of uncertainty, or the possibility of receiving a placebo. Overall, trial experiences were viewed positively, although families commonly reported hope, stress, and fear of not completing the study. The main practical challenge was fitting regular medical appointments into daily life. The findings support stronger engagement with patients and caregivers when designing and explaining epilepsy trials, including those evaluating CBD, while the abstract does not report treatment-effect outcomes from the trials themselves.

💡 Key Findings

1
Treating neurologists proposed trial participation in 39 of 44 cases (88%), highlighting the central role of clinical teams in recruitment.
Good
65%
2
Caregivers were mainly motivated by access to new treatments, hope, and confidence in their medical team, while concerns about adverse events, uncertainty, and placebo assignment discouraged participation.
Good
65%
3
Overall trial experiences were rated positively, although hope, stress, and fear of not completing the trial were common emotions.
Good
65%
4
The main practical barrier was managing regular medical appointments alongside daily schedules; post-trial regret and solitude were reported as very low.
Good
60%
5
The authors conclude that patient and stakeholder engagement is essential for improving trial recruitment, acceptance, and understanding of unsuccessful trials.
Good
70%

📄 Original Abstract

To explore how caregivers perceived their child's participation in four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Dravet syndrome (DS), conducted between 1996 and 2024, on stiripentol (STP), cannabidiol (CBD), fenfluramine (FFA), and soticlestat (TAK-935). A semi-structured, cross-sectional survey, in French, assessed families' motivations for enrolling in the trials, their perceptions throughout the different trial phases, and challenges encountered. Ten caregivers reported that their child had participated in the STP trial, 20 in the CBD trial, 13 in the FFA trial, and 1 in the TAK-935 trial. In most cases (39/44, 88%), trial participation was proposed by the treating (paediatric) neurologist. The main reasons for non-enrolment were satisfactory seizure control, the trial having ended before awareness, and ineligibility. Motivations for participation were mostly access to new treatments, hope, and confidence in the medical team, whereas non-participation was primarily driven by concerns about adverse events, emotional impact of uncertainty, and potential placebo assignment. Overall, trial experiences were rated positively: hope, fear of not completing the trial, and stress were the most frequently reported emotions throughout the trial, while the primary barriers related to daily schedules to accommodate regular medical appointments. Regret and solitude post-trial were scored very low. To our knowledge, this is the first survey exploring the caregivers' perceptions of participation in epilepsy clinical trials. Patient and stakeholder engagement is essential for optimizing trial recruitment, acceptance and understanding of the failures.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.