Why ICU patients may need different antiseizure medication strategies

Antiseizure medication dosing and monitoring in the intensive care unit: a practical narrative review.

Intensive care medicine • • Review • Related
🤖

AI Summary

This narrative review explains why antiseizure medications (ASMs) can behave differently in the intensive care unit than in routine outpatient care. Organ dysfunction, severe illness, multiple medications, and supportive devices can all change drug exposure, making standard dosing less reliable. The review covers 15 ASMs, including cannabidiol, and discusses dosing, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

The authors emphasize that ICU treatment requires an individualized approach, particularly when patients have kidney or other organ problems or are receiving renal replacement therapy, ECMO, or plasmapheresis. For people taking cannabidiol or other ASMs who become critically ill, the broader practical message is that clinicians need a complete medication history and may need to adjust treatment and monitor drug levels. The abstract reports no quantitative treatment outcomes; it presents a practical synthesis of existing literature rather than a new clinical trial.

💡 Key Findings

1
Antiseizure medications can have substantially different pharmacokinetics in the ICU than in outpatient care, requiring individualized dosing and monitoring.
Good
70%
2
The review includes 15 ASMs, including cannabidiol, and examines how organ dysfunction, drug interactions, and critical-care devices can affect medication exposure.
Good
70%
3
Renal replacement therapy, ECMO, and plasmapheresis may alter ASM exposure, making therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical assessment important in selected ICU settings.
Good
70%
4
The authors conclude that ICU ASM management requires a distinct approach from outpatient treatment, with tailored agent selection, dosing, and monitoring.
Good
75%

📄 Original Abstract

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) and often exhibit pharmacokinetics that differ substantially from those in healthy volunteers or in the outpatient setting. Organ dysfunction, polypharmacy, exogenous devices, and greater severity of illness all influence ASM pharmacokinetics, dosing decisions, and monitoring parameters. It is essential for critical care clinicians to familiarize themselves with the pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, effects of exogenous devices, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-all covered in this narrative review-to incorporate in their approach to ASMs in the critical care setting. We identified relevant literature from MEDLINE from inception to March 2026 related to ASMs in the ICU. Data on pharmacokinetics, dosing in the ICU, the effect of renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and plasmapheresis (PLEX) on ASM exposure, and the role of TDM in the ICU were collected and summarized. Considerations for 15 ASMs (brivaracetam, cannabidiol, carbamazepine, cenobamate, clobazam, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, phenytoin, topiramate, valproate, and zonisamide) were included in the review. Dosing considerations for TDM, including indications and target reference ranges, and specific settings such as organ dysfunction, illness severity, renal replacement therapy, ECMO, and PLEX are discussed. The use of ASMs in the ICU require a distinct approach from outpatient settings. Severity of illness, organ dysfunction and replacement devices, and frequent drug-drug interactions warrant tailored agent selection, dosing, and monitoring.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.