2-AG in brain circuit shifts reward-cue decisions in rats

Enhancement of 2-arachidonoylglycerol but not anandamide signaling in the ventral tegmental area selectively increases the choice to respond to reward-predictive incentive cues in male rats.

Neuropharmacology • • Highly Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This study examined how two endocannabinoids—2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide—influence motivation toward reward-predictive cues. Male rats learned to respond to an audiovisual signal that indicated a sucrose reward. Researchers increased 2-AG or anandamide specifically in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), a brain region involved in reward and motivation.

Increasing 2-AG in the VTA made rats more likely to choose to respond to the reward cue, but it did not make their responses faster or more vigorous. Increasing anandamide had little effect. The CB1 receptor blocker rimonabant prevented the 2-AG-related increase in cue responding, supporting a role for CB1 signaling. The findings also suggest that the stronger, broader effects seen after whole-body 2-AG enhancement involve brain regions beyond the VTA. Because this was an animal study, it does not show that cannabis or cannabinoid products will produce the same effects in people.

💡 Key Findings

1
Increasing 2-AG in the ventral tegmental area increased the choice to respond to reward-predictive cues in male rats.
Limited
35%
2
Increasing anandamide in the VTA had little effect on responding to the reward cue.
Limited
35%
3
The 2-AG effect was blocked by a CB1 receptor antagonist, indicating that CB1 signaling was required for the increased cue responding.
Limited
35%
4
VTA 2-AG enhancement changed the decision to respond, but not the vigor or rapidity of responding to the cue or the sucrose reward itself.
Limited
35%

📄 Original Abstract

Mesolimbic endocannabinoid (eCB) signaling impacts reward-seeking behaviors that rely on incentive salience. We previously showed that systemic enhancement of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) using the monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor MJN110 robustly decreased the latency of responding to reward-predictive incentive cues (ICs) and collecting the reward, as well as the choice to respond to the IC. Here we sought to determine the contribution of the endocannabinoids 2-AG and anandamide in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in mediating incentive salience processes. We microinfused MJN110 or PF3845, a fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor, into the VTA to increase 2-AG and anandamide, respectively in male rats. These rats were trained to nosepoke during an 8-sec audiovisual IC to receive a 10% sucrose reward. We found that while intra-VTA PF3845 had little effect on responding to the IC, intra-VTA MJN110 specifically increased only the choice to respond without impacting the vigor (e.g., rapidity) of the response towards either the IC or the sucrose reward itself. This contrasts with our previous work in which systemic MJN110 treatment enhanced choice, and vigor to both the IC and reward. Further, the intra-VTA MJN110 enhancement of responding to ICs was blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant. Our results suggest that increasing 2-AG, but not anandamide, in the VTA selectively enhances the choice to respond to cues predicting a reward. However, the effects of systemic MJN110 in enhancing the vigor of responding cannot be attributed to VTA 2-AG signaling.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.