Better diagnosis could lead to more targeted help for drug use

Substance use disorders diagnostic practice in Australia: A study of Queensland's adult mental health services.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry • • Moderately Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This study examined how substance use disorders were diagnosed in Queensland’s public adult mental health services using four years of electronic health records from 58,724 adults. A substance use disorder was recorded for 34.4% of patients. The most commonly identified substance classes included nicotine, cannabinoids, alcohol and stimulants, while “multiple and other drug use” was the most frequent broad category at 14.1%.

The findings suggest that diagnoses were often not specific or consistent with formal classification guidance. Among patients with any substance use disorder, 45.3% were recorded as having multiple, other or residual drug-use disorders, and 21.3% had substance-induced psychosis. The authors conclude that some broad or complex diagnoses may be overused, while nicotine use disorder may be missed. For people seeking help for cannabis or other drug use, the practical implication is that clinicians should identify the specific substance involved and regularly review the diagnosis so treatment can be better matched to the person’s needs.

💡 Key Findings

1
A substance use disorder was recorded in 34.4% of adults receiving public mental health care, with cannabinoids among the commonly identified substance classes.
High
80%
2
Diagnostic practice showed limited specificity and consistency, with broad categories such as “multiple and other drug use” used frequently.
High
80%
3
The authors suggest that some complex or nonspecific diagnoses may be over-diagnosed, while nicotine use disorder is likely under-diagnosed.
Good
75%
4
Clinicians should name the specific substance involved and conduct ongoing diagnostic review to support more targeted treatment.
High
85%

📄 Original Abstract

Effective treatment and care of substance use disorders requires reliable and valid diagnosis. Their diagnosis in mental health services reportedly remains inconsistent despite their prevalence and associated harms. This study examines routine substance use disorder diagnosis across public adult mental health services to identify patterns. Care recorded in the statewide electronic health record of 58,724 adults over 4 years was analysed. Substance use disorder diagnosis, specified and aggregated by substance class and clinical state, was compared across gender, age, substance class and diagnostic groups. Substance use disorder was present in 34.4% of patients. Common specific substance classes were nicotine, cannabinoids, alcohol and stimulants (excluding cocaine). The most common class at 14.1% was multiple and other drug use. Of those with any substance use disorder, 45.3% had multiple and other drug use or other residual use disorders and 21.3% had substance-induced psychosis. People with schizophrenia had higher proportions of substance use disorders than the entire cohort. Substance use disorder diagnostic practice lacks specificity and consistency with diagnostic classification guidance. Disorders requiring combined consideration of aetiology and comorbidity, including 'multiple and other drug use' disorders and substance-induced psychosis, may be over-diagnosed. Nicotine use disorder is likely under-diagnosed. Improving diagnostic specificity is central to effectively treating substance use disorders. Non-specific substance use disorder diagnoses, including 'multiple and other drug' use, should be avoided unless necessary. Specific substances should be named. Consistent use of diagnostic classifications and ongoing diagnostic review are vital for diagnostic clarification and specific treatment.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.