Dutch and Spanish cannabis motives questionnaire shows cross-cultural validity

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Comprehensive Cannabis Motives Questionnaire in Dutch and Spanish.

Substance use & misuse • • Highly Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This study asked whether Dutch and Spanish translations of the Comprehensive Cannabis Motives Questionnaire (CCMQ) reliably measure why people use cannabis across cultural settings. Researchers used forward and back-translation, then assessed responses from cannabis users in the Netherlands (N = 200) and Spain (N = 209). They compared the questionnaire’s structure and its relationship with scores on the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R).

💡 Key Findings

1
Confirmatory factor analysis supported the questionnaire’s original eight-factor structure in both the Dutch and Spanish samples.
High
80%
2
After removing selected low-performing items from the Dutch version, a 38-item instrument showed strict invariance across English, Dutch, and Spanish groups, indicating that the measure functioned comparably across these language groups.
High
80%
3
The Dutch and Spanish versions demonstrated strong psychometric properties and cross-cultural validity, while the authors emphasized culturally nuanced interpretation of cannabis-use motives.
High
80%
4
The abstract reports that questionnaire subscales were examined in relation to CUDIT-R scores, but it does not provide the specific associations, effect sizes, or numerical fit results.
High
95%

📄 Original Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the motivational pathways underlying cannabis use across cultural contexts is essential for advancing clinical assessment and theoretical models of substance use motivation. The Comprehensive Cannabis Motives Questionnaire (CCMQ) captures a range of cannabis use motives. This study validated Dutch and Spanish translations and examined their psychometric properties. METHODS: Following forward and back-translation, cannabis users in the Netherlands (N = 200) and Spain (N = 209) completed the CCMQ and the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed model fit per translation, and multi-group testing examined configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance across language, country, and sex. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and correlations tested predictive validity for CUDIT-R scores. RESULTS: CFA supported the original eight-factor structure in both samples. After removing a Food item and two low-variance Conformity items from the Dutch translation, a 38-item instrument supported strict invariance across English, Dutch, and Spanish groups; sex comparisons used 40 items (CCMQ2 removed) and English/Spanish-only comparisons retained the full 41-item instrument. SEM and correlations examined associations between CCMQ subscales and CUDIT-R scores. CONCLUSION: The Dutch and Spanish CCMQ versions demonstrated strong psychometric properties and cross-cultural validity. Findings highlight the importance of culturally nuanced interpretation of motivational constructs.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.