How social support shields teens from violence and substance use

Protective Factors Against Violence and Substance Use in Adolescents: A Latent Class Analysis.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine • • Moderately Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This research examined how protective factors—like social support, future planning, and community resources—shield adolescents from both violence and substance use. Using data from 3,641 high school students, researchers identified five distinct risk groups, ranging from those with low violence and low substance use (73% of students) to a small group experiencing multiple forms of violence combined with high substance use. The study found that marijuana use was reported by 20% of students, often clustering with vaping (18%) and, in the highest-risk group, with concerning opioid use rates.

The most striking finding was that violence and substance use rarely occur in isolation among adolescents. High social support emerged as the strongest protective factor, significantly reducing the odds of belonging to any high-risk group compared to the low-risk category. Additionally, youth with strong future orientation—a sense of hope and planning—showed lower odds of involvement in sexual violence combined with moderate substance use. Notably, sexually diverse youth were overrepresented in the two highest-risk categories, making up roughly half of students experiencing sexual violence or multiple violence types alongside substance use.

These findings suggest that comprehensive interventions targeting youth with overlapping exposures to violence and substance use are essential. Rather than treating these issues separately, public health approaches should recognize their interconnection and leverage protective factors like community connectedness and peer support to buffer vulnerable adolescents—particularly LGBTQ+ youth who face disproportionate risks.

📄 Original Abstract

Substance use (SU) and violence drive a significant proportion of adolescent mortality. Identifying shared protective factors is crucial. We aimed to characterize adolescent SU and violence typologies and examine associations with protective factors. Using cross-sectional surveys from 17 high schools, we assessed individual (psychological empowerment and future orientation), interpersonal (social support and school connectedness), and environmental (Child Opportunity Index) protective factors. We used latent class analysis to identify risk profiles across multiple forms of SU and violence. Multinomial regression assessed relationships between protective factors and latent class membership. Among 3,641 respondents, fighting was the most frequent violence type (20.2%). Marijuana use (20.0%) and vaping (17.6%) were common. Latent class analysis revealed five groupings: (1) low violence and low SU (72.7%); (2) low violence and high SU (10.3%); (3) sexual violence and moderate SU (5.7%); (4) high multiple violence and high SU (2.4%); and (5) fighting and marijuana/vaping (8.8%). Opioid use was highest (55.1%) in the high SU and high multiple violence class. Sexually diverse youth comprised most of the sexual violence and moderate SU (52.9%) and high multiple violence and high SU (50.6%) classes. Compared to the low violence and low SU class, high social support was associated with lower odds of membership in other categories. High future orientation was associated with lower odds of membership in the sexual violence and moderate SU class relative to low violence groups. Experiencing multiple types of violence tends to co-occur with SU, necessitating interventions for youth with compounding exposures.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.