Why cannabis research is missing half the picture

Sex and gender influences on problematic cannabis use and cannabis use disorder: A scoping review protocol.

PloS one • • Highly Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This scoping review addresses a critical gap in cannabis research: the lack of sex and gender-focused studies on cannabis use disorder (CUD) and problematic cannabis use. While cannabis use has historically been more common among men and boys, the gender gap has been narrowing in recent decades, driven by increasing use among women and girls. Despite this demographic shift, cannabis research has largely overlooked sex and gender as important variables, leaving significant blind spots in our understanding of how people of different genders experience cannabis use and respond to treatment.

The researchers aim to synthesize existing evidence about how biological sex and social gender influence both the development of problematic cannabis use and treatment outcomes. This includes examining correlates (factors associated with CUD), treatment effectiveness, and clinical outcomes across different groups. Importantly, the review will also explore how sex and gender intersect with other social factors like race and sexuality, recognizing that cannabis use patterns and treatment needs are shaped by multiple overlapping identities and social experiences.

This work has significant practical implications for developing more effective, inclusive treatment approaches for people with CUD. By identifying sex and gender-specific patterns in cannabis use, addiction severity, and treatment response, researchers and clinicians can create tailored interventions that address the distinct needs of different populations. The review highlights that evidence-based treatment currently lacks the nuanced, gender-informed perspective needed to optimize care for the growing population of women and gender-diverse individuals using cannabis.

💡 Key Findings

1
Cannabis use disorder is more prevalent in men, but the gender gap has narrowed significantly in recent decades due to increasing cannabis use among women and girls who were historically underrepresented in research.
High
95%
2
Current cannabis research lacks adequate sex and gender-focused analysis, leaving critical gaps in understanding how biological sex and social gender influence the development of problematic cannabis use and treatment outcomes.
High
90%
3
Treatment effectiveness and clinical outcomes may differ significantly by gender, but existing evidence synthesis hasn't adequately examined these differences to inform gender-tailored clinical care.
High
85%
4
Sex and gender effects on cannabis use intersect with other social categories like race and sexuality, requiring multidimensional analysis to develop truly inclusive treatment approaches.
High
80%

📄 Original Abstract

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are more prevalent among men and boys than among women and girls. However, this sex/gender gap has been narrowing in recent decades, likely due to an increase in cannabis use among women and girls, who have been historically under-represented in cannabis research. The lack of sex- and gender-based approaches within cannabis research has been highlighted in previous reviews, some of which have synthesized existing literature of associations between sex, gender, and cannabis use. What is missing is a clinically-relevant synthesis of evidence for sex and gender influences on problematic cannabis use, including treatment-related outcomes that could be used to influence care. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize published evidence about the influence of sex and gender on correlates and outcomes of treatment among people with problematic cannabis use (including CUD). Furthermore, we will examine to what extent this published literature has considered how sex and gender intersect with other social categories such as race and sexuality.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.