Survivors seek safer, more supportive cannabis care in pregnancy

Barriers to evidence-based counseling and support for perinatal intimate partner violence survivors using cannabis and nicotine products: Survivor and advocate perspectives.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics β€’ β€’ Highly Relevant
πŸ€–

AI Summary

This qualitative study examined how intimate partner violence (IPV) affects conversations about cannabis and nicotine use during pregnancy and the perinatal period. Interviews with IPV advocates and survivors who used cannabis or nicotine revealed widespread misunderstandings, inconsistent advice, and limited information about potential risks and cessation support. The study did not measure treatment outcomes or establish the effectiveness of any specific intervention.

Participants called for more nonjudgmental and consistent communication from health care providers. They also emphasized the value of peer support and programs that bring together IPV services and substance-use counseling. For pregnant and postpartum cannabis users, the findings suggest that care should address safety, coercion, and cessation needs togetherβ€”without blaming or stigmatizing survivors.

πŸ’‘ Key Findings

1
Interviews revealed misconceptions and conflicting guidance about cannabis and nicotine use during pregnancy.
Good
60%
2
Gaps in provider knowledge and patient resources may make it harder for survivors to receive effective cessation support.
Good
60%
3
Participants emphasized the need for nonjudgmental, consistent conversations about substance use and intimate partner violence.
Good
70%
4
The study supports developing survivor-centered programs that combine IPV services, peer support, and cannabis or nicotine counseling.
Good
60%

πŸ“„ Original Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common during the perinatal period and is associated with increased use of nicotine and cannabis and difficulty with cessation. Despite this intersection, health care providers rarely address IPV and substance use (SU) concurrently, and there is little empirically guided information regarding how this communication should occur. This qualitative analysis explores IPV advocates' and perinatal survivors' perspectives on clinician approaches to perinatal cannabis and nicotine product use, highlighting areas for improvement. We performed semistructured, virtual 45- to 60-min interviews with IPV advocates and perinatal IPV survivors who used cannabis or nicotine. Interviews focused on: (1) how systems-level coercion related to SU manifests in health care; (2) survivors' experiences with nicotine or cannabis during the perinatal period; and (3) available resources. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Interviews with 19 IPV advocates and 15 survivors highlighted misconceptions and miscommunications about cannabis and nicotine product use during pregnancy. Gaps in knowledge related to risks of perinatal SU and best practices for cessation in pregnancy stemmed from inadequate education, inconsistent provider guidance, and limited resources. Participants stressed the need for nonjudgmental, consistent conversations and increased access to peer support and co-located IPV and cessation programs. Perinatal IPV survivors receive conflicting guidance on cannabis and nicotine product use, despite known risks. Findings reveal gaps in integrated IPV and SU support, highlighting the need for development of survivor-centered interventions that aim to improve patient-provider communication on perinatal IPV and SU.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.