Candy-like packaging makes cannabis edibles seem safer than they really are

The Impact of Product Packaging on Perceptions of Cannabis Edibles: Results from Two Randomized Experiments.

Substance use & misuse • • Moderately Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

Cannabis edibles have become increasingly popular as legalization spreads across the United States, but a new study reveals that how these products are packaged can significantly influence consumer perceptions—sometimes misleadingly. Researchers conducted two randomized experiments with over 3,700 adults to examine how package imagery and product descriptors affect the way people perceive cannabis edibles. The findings show that flavor imagery on packaging increased perceptions of appeal, safety, and healthiness, while medical imagery and nature scenes suggested health benefits. Notably, animal imagery raised concerns about appeal to children, suggesting potential risks for unintended youth exposure.

Interestingly, the study found that descriptors like "all natural," "organic," "handcrafted," and "energy boost" had the opposite effect—they actually decreased appeal and willingness to try the product. This counterintuitive result suggests that marketing language on edible packaging may not follow the same rules as traditional food products. The researchers emphasize that package imagery, particularly flavor-focused designs, may mislead consumers into perceiving cannabis edibles as safer or more appealing than they actually are, potentially increasing risks of overconsumption.

These findings have important implications for cannabis policy and consumer protection. As edibles continue to grow in popularity, the study highlights the urgent need for stronger packaging regulations to prevent misleading marketing claims. Since edibles are already perceived as less harmful than smoked cannabis—sometimes incorrectly—packaging designs that enhance perceived safety could contribute to risky consumption patterns. The research underscores the importance of clear, honest product labeling and visual design standards to help consumers make informed decisions.

📄 Original Abstract

As cannabis legalization expands in the United States, edibles have grown in popularity. Often perceived as less harmful than smoked cannabis, edibles are packaged like food products with imagery and product descriptors that may impact consumer perceptions, potentially increasing risks of overconsumption. We conducted two randomized online experiments among adults aged 18-65 between March and June 2024. In one experiment (N = 1260), participants were randomized to view packages with flavor, outdoor nature, medical, animal, or no-imagery. In a second experiment (N = 2521), participants viewed packages with one of nine product descriptors or no-product descriptors. Outcomes included measures of appeal, safety, and behavioral intent and were preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06358144, NCT06171399). Compared to no-imagery, flavor imagery was associated with greater appeal, safety, and healthiness, while outdoor nature and medical imagery conveyed healthiness. Animal imagery was associated with perceptions of greater appeal to children. In contrast, product descriptors (e.g. "all natural," "organic," "handcrafted," and "energy boost") were associated with less appeal and interest in trying relative to control packages and did not enhance perceived safety. Package imagery, particularly flavor imagery, may mislead consumers by increasing the appeal and perceived safety of edibles, while product descriptors may have the opposite effect. These findings highlight the need for more comprehensive packaging regulations and further research on real-world purchasing behavior.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.