How cannabis ads and warnings interact to shape young adults' perceptions

Perceptions of Cannabis Vaping Advertising Messages and Warnings Among US Young Adults.

Substance use & addiction journal • • Moderately Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This study examined how 3,581 US young adults aged 18-34 respond to different cannabis vaping advertisements and warning labels. Researchers tested various combinations of advertising messages (emphasizing psychological effects versus flavors) paired with different warnings (none, adult-use only, intoxication risks, or vape-specific warnings) to understand how these communications influence perceptions of addictiveness, harm, cautiousness, appeal, and interest in cannabis vaping products. The research provides crucial insights into how marketing and warning labels interact to shape young adult attitudes toward cannabis products.

The findings reveal interesting differences between cannabis users and non-users. Among non-users and the overall sample, neither the advertising messages nor warnings had significant effects on perceptions. However, among the 40.8% of participants who reported past-month cannabis use, specific combinations mattered. Those exposed to adult-use warnings perceived cannabis as less addictive and reported lower cautiousness, while intoxication warnings were associated with lower perceived harm. Most intriguingly, a significant interaction emerged: cannabis users who saw psychological effects messaging combined with intoxication warnings found the products more appealing, while those who saw flavor-focused ads with intoxication warnings found them less appealing.

These results highlight a critical insight for policymakers and public health advocates: advertising messages and warning labels don't operate in isolation—they interact in complex ways that can either reinforce or undermine intended messages. The finding that warning labels paired with certain advertising approaches can paradoxically increase appeal among users challenges assumptions about warning effectiveness and suggests that regulatory strategies must carefully consider how different messaging components work together. This research strengthens the evidence base for developing more effective cannabis advertising restrictions and warning requirements tailored to different audiences.

📄 Original Abstract

Cannabis vaping prevalence and marketing has increased, but limited research has assessed effects of specific advertising messages, warnings, or their combinations on young adults' perceptions. This study aimed to advance this research. In 2024, 3581 US young adults aged 18 to 34 (40.8% reporting past-month use) participated in an online survey-based experiment using a 2 × 4 factorial design (advertising message: psychological effects vs flavors; warning: none, adult-use, intoxication, vape-specific) and then reported on 5 perception outcomes: addictiveness, harm, cautiousness, appeal, and interest (0 = not at all to 7 = extremely). Multivariable regression assessed advertising message, warning, and message-by-warning interactions in relation to outcomes, overall and by past-month use status. Among the total sample and among participants reporting no cannabis use, there were no main or interaction effects of advertising message or warning conditions. Among participants reporting use, adult-use (vs no) warning exposure was associated with lower addictiveness and cautiousness; intoxication (vs no) warning exposure was associated with lower harm. A significant interaction indicated that participants reporting use who were exposed to both psychological effects (vs flavors) advertising messages and intoxication (vs no) warnings reported greater appeal, whereas those exposed to both flavors (vs effects) advertising messages and intoxication (vs no) warnings reported lower appeal. These findings highlight the importance of understanding how advertising messages may affect how warnings are interpreted (or vice versa), strengthening the evidence base informing advertising restrictions and warning requirements, and elucidating the mechanisms driving the differences among young adults who use versus do not use cannabis.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.