Durban Poison vs Green Crack

See how these research profiles differ in THC, reported effects, terpenes, lineage and source coverage.

Research profiles describe public information, not a specific product, batch or guaranteed experience.

Build your comparison

Choose 2โ€“5 strains. Search by name, or pick from the popularity chart.

2 of 5

Selected strains

Durban Poison
Green Crack
How to Read This ComparisonResearch context, uncertainty, and product limits

Compare Research Profiles

This Is Why I'm High organizes factual claims, structured attributes, and source records found through public research.

Treat Missing Data as Unknown

An empty field is not a zero, a negative result, or proof that a strain lacks that trait.

Expect Product Variation

Names can span different breeders, phenotypes, batches, and labels. This page does not verify a specific product.

At a glance

From each strain's research profile

THC

Listed THC sits within 1.5 points, from 17.5% to 19%.

  • Durban Poison17.5%
  • Green Crack19%

Reported effects

Every profile reports energetic, uplifted and focused.

EnergeticUpliftedFocused
Only Durban Poison
Creative
Only Green Crack
Nothing unique listed

Lead terpene

Each profile leads with a different terpene.

Durban Poison
Caryophyllene
Green Crack
Myrcene

These are catalog research profiles, not a test of the product in your hand. Scan your label for its real numbers

Side by side

Durban Poison
Green Crack
Durban PoisonPure Sat

This Is Why I'm High Research Profile

Durban Poison

Broad profile27 listed sources
Green CrackSativa-Dom

This Is Why I'm High Research Profile

Green Crack

Broad profile22 listed sources
Broad profile5/5 areas
Listed Sources
27
Multiple listed sources
Profile Updated
Oct 30, 2026
This Is Why I'm High record date

Current Limits

All 5 profile areas contain information; individual claims can still vary in support.

Coverage describes this This Is Why I'm High research profileโ€”not product testing, safety, or batch verification.

Broad profile5/5 areas
Listed Sources
22
Multiple listed sources
Profile Updated
Oct 3, 2026
This Is Why I'm High record date

Current Limits

All 5 profile areas contain information; individual claims can still vary in support.

Coverage describes this This Is Why I'm High research profileโ€”not product testing, safety, or batch verification.

  1. 1Pure South African landrace sativa with 1970s roots and no hybrid dilution
  2. 2Terpinolene-driven profile delivers sweet, anise, citrus, and pine aromas
  3. 3Energizing, focused, and talkative high perfect for daytime creativity
  1. 1Energizing sativa-dominant hybrid bred from Skunk #1 and Afghani landrace genetics
  2. 2Tropical mango-citrus flavor backed by a myrcene, limonene, and pinene terpene blend
  3. 3Delivers focused, uplifted, talkative effects ideal for daytime productivity
17.5%
THC
0.51%
CBD
Type I(THC-dominant)
Ratio1:34
19%
THC
0.55%
CBD
Type I(THC-dominant)
Ratio1:35
Balancing High
Steady and easygoing
Entourage High
Whole-plant compound mix
EnergeticUpliftedFocusedCreative
EnergeticFocusedUplifted
๐ŸŒ…Morning
WorkWatching TV/MoviesSocializingFocus & Concentration
Most activities
๐ŸŒ…Morning
WorkCreative ProjectsSocializingWatching TV/Movies
Most activities
๐ŸงชCaryophyllene
Aromas
SweetEarthyPine
Flavors
SweetEarthyPineHerbal
๐ŸงชMyrcene
Aromas
CitrusMangoEarthyTropical
Flavors
CitrusMangoEarthyTropical

Matchups people search for

Take this comparison further

A research profile describes a strain across the whole market. These tools get closer to what is in your jar and what works for you.

Your stash, decoded.