Adolescents naming any available drug reported lower recovery capital

Recovery capital and substance(s) of choice among adolescents: Exploratory analyses.

Addictive behaviors reports โ€ข โ€ข Moderately Relevant
๐Ÿค–

AI Summary

This abstract-based summary covers an exploratory secondary analysis asking whether adolescentsโ€™ substance of choice (SOC) is associated with recovery capitalโ€”resources that can support recovery. The study analyzed survey data from 624 students attending a recovery high school. Participants reported substances they preferred, including cannabis, and completed a modified recovery-capital assessment; this was an observational analysis, not a treatment trial.

Recovery-capital scores differed across groups defined by the number of SOCs. In post hoc comparisons, adolescents who answered โ€œwhatever is availableโ€ reported lower recovery capital than those who named one preferred substance. Scores did not significantly differ by substance type, including cannabis. These findings show an association, not that substance preference causes differences in recovery resources; the abstract cannot establish why the groups differed or whether the result applies beyond adolescents in recovery high schools.

๐Ÿ’ก Key Findings

1
Across groups based on the number of substances of choice, recovery-capital scores differed significantly in this adolescent recovery-high-school sample.
High
90%
2
Those reporting โ€œwhatever is availableโ€ had lower recovery capital than those preferring one substance in post hoc comparisons.
High
90%
3
Recovery capital did not significantly differ by substance type, including cannabis.
High
90%

๐Ÿ“„ Original Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recovery capital is the availability of resources to support recovery. Prior research suggests a relationship between substances of choice (SOC) and recovery capital. This study explored the relationship between SOC and recovery capital among adolescents attending a recovery high school. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of data from the SEARS project was conducted. Participants (Nโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ624, agemeanโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ16.36) completed a modified Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and responded to the question: "What is your drug of choice? (Please select all that apply)". Substances were grouped into type of SOC (alcohol, cannabis, opioids, stimulants, or other) and number of SOC (one, two, three or more, or "whatever is available"). RESULTS: A Kruskal-Wallis test to compare recovery capital across number of SOC groups indicated a significant difference, ฯ‡2(dfโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3, Nโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ624)โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.17, pโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ.043. Post hoc comparisons using Dunn's test identified that participants who selected "whatever is available" reported lower recovery capital than participants who preferred one SOC, p adjusted โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ0.022. There were no significant differences in recovery capital across type of SOC. DISCUSSION: The current study identified a relationship between number of SOC and recovery capital, suggesting those who prefer "whatever is available" may benefit from additional support. More work is needed to assess the utility and implications of SOC among adolescents in recovery. Researchers who ask participants about SOC may consider allowing participants to select multiple substances and including an option for "whatever is available" to better capture use preferences.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.