Cohort study links genetic risk to problematic cannabis use; initiation age…

Polygenic prediction of cannabis-related outcomes: Evidence from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children longitudinal cohort and the European gene-environment interaction case-control study.

Addiction (Abingdon, England) • • Highly Relevant
🤖

AI Summary

This observational study tested whether genetic predispositions—estimated with polygenic risk scores (PRSs)—for cannabis use disorder, depression, insomnia, and chronic pain were associated with cannabis initiation and later problematic use. Researchers analyzed participants in the UK ALSPAC birth cohort and sought conceptual replication in the European EU-GEI case-control study. Cannabis-related outcomes included self-reported use and scores on a questionnaire measuring problematic use; this was not a trial and cannot show that genetic risk causes cannabis use patterns.

In ALSPAC, higher PRSs for cannabis use disorder, depression, and chronic pain were associated with higher problematic-use scores at some measured ages. In EU-GEI, cannabis use disorder and chronic-pain PRSs were associated with weekly-to-daily use; the analysis also found evidence that cannabis use disorder genetic liability and early initiation interacted on an additive scale. The authors report that age at initiation explained more variation in problematic use than any single PRS. These are associations, not evidence of clinical importance or causation. This abstract-based summary cannot establish why the associations occur, and results may not generalize beyond the studied cohorts.

💡 Key Findings

1
In ALSPAC, higher polygenic risk scores for cannabis use disorder, depression, and chronic pain were associated with higher problematic-use questionnaire scores at one or more ages.
Good
70%
2
In EU-GEI, genetic risk scores for cannabis use disorder and chronic pain were associated with weekly-to-daily cannabis use.
Good
70%
3
The study found evidence of an additive interaction between cannabis use disorder genetic liability and early cannabis initiation; it reported no such interaction for depression and schizophrenia PRSs.
Good
60%
4
Age at cannabis initiation explained more variance in problematic use than any single PRS, according to the study summary.
Good
70%

📄 Original Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for cannabis use disorder (CUD), major depressive disorder (MDD), insomnia and chronic pain, and early age at cannabis initiation might be linked to problematic cannabis use. We tested whether: (1) higher PRS for CUD, MDD, insomnia and chronic pain are associated with earlier initiation and problematic cannabis use; (2) age at cannabis initiation explains more variance in problematic use than any single PRS; and (3) PRSs moderate the association between early initiation and problematic cannabis use. DESIGN: Observational study involving two cohorts: (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) population-based birth cohort and (2) for conceptual replication, the EUropean Gene-Environment Interaction (EU-GEI) first-episode psychosis case-control study. SETTING: (1) United Kingdom; (2b) 16 population-based catchment areas in Europe and 1 in Brazil, with FEP cases recruited from mental health services and controls from the general population of the same catchment areas. PARTICIPANTS: For ALSPAC, n = 8224 genotyped (51% male); subsamples with Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST) at 17 years (n = 895), 20y (n = 1587), 24y (n = 836) and frequency of use at 24y (n = 2908). EU-GEI: n = 776 [controls: mean age 37.2, standard deviation (SD) = 13.5; 47% male] and 491 FEP cases (mean age 31.5, SD = 11.2; 62.5% male). MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were self-reported lifetime and frequency of cannabis use and CAST score (problematic use questionnaire). Predictors were PRSs for CUD, MDD, insomnia and chronic pain. Models were adjusted for sex, age and genetic principal components (ALSPAC), and additionally for site and case-control status (EU-GEI). RESULTS: In ALSPAC, CUD PRS was associated with CAST score at 20 [beta coefficient (β) = 0.04, False Discovery Rate-corrected P-value (pFDR) = 0.03] and CAST at 24 years (β = 0.11, pFDR = 0.005). MDD PRS was associated with CAST scores at 17y (β = 0.1, pFDR = 0.002), 20y (β = 0.06, pFDR = 0.01) and 24y (β = 0.09, pFDR = 0.01). Pain PRS was associated with the CAST scores at 17y (β = 0.09, pFDR = 0.002), 20y (β = 0.07, pFDR < 0.001) and 24y (β = 0.09, pFDR = 0.005). In EU-GEI, CUD PRS (RRR = 1.82, pFDR = 0.001) and pain PRS (RRR = 1.27, pFDR = 0.007) were associated with weekly-to-daily use. The Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction RERI model showed evidence of additive interaction for CUD PRS, RERI = 2.4, P = 0.009, while MDD and schizophrenia PRS showed no evidence of additive interaction. SUMMARY: Genetic liability, measured by polygenic risk scores, to cannabis use disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain appears to be associated with heavier and more problematic cannabis use. Age at cannabis initiation explains more variance in problematic cannabis use than polygenic liability.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.