Urban youth with low substance use may still face substantial needs

Neighborhood violence, visible drug activity, and substance use among urban youth: Mental health and community factors.

Drug and alcohol dependence β€’ β€’ Moderately Relevant
πŸ€–

AI Summary

This cross-sectional survey study examined how neighborhood risks and substance use clustered among 743 urban adolescents aged 13–21. The researchers included witnessing neighborhood violence, seeing drugs sold nearby, and lifetime vaping, alcohol, and marijuana use in a latent class analysis. They identified three profiles: 34% had no neighborhood risk exposure and low or no substance use, 40% had high exposure but low or no use, and 26% had high exposure and polysubstance use.

Compared with adolescents facing high neighborhood exposure but reporting low or no use, those in the no-risk/low-use profile reported more neighborhood support and less racial discrimination, school absence, and suicidal thinking. The high-exposure/polysubstance-use profile differed mainly in having more depressive symptoms. The findings suggest that low substance use does not necessarily mean low need among youth exposed to neighborhood risks. Because this was a cross-sectional study, it cannot establish cause and effect; this is an abstract-based summary, not a review of the full paper.

πŸ’‘ Key Findings

1
The study identified three profiles combining neighborhood risk exposure with low or no substance use or polysubstance use.
High
95%
2
Adolescents with high neighborhood exposure and low or no substance use reported less neighborhood support and more racial discrimination, missed school, and suicidal thoughts than the no-risk/low-use group.
High
90%
3
Compared with the high-exposure/low-use group, the high-exposure/polysubstance-use group was distinguished mainly by higher depressive symptoms.
High
90%
4
Low substance use did not indicate low need among adolescents exposed to neighborhood risks; the authors emphasize assessing mental health and community factors alongside substance use.
High
90%

πŸ“„ Original Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent substance use and exposure to neighborhood violence frequently co-occur in U.S. urban settings, particularly among racially minoritized and low-income youth. Despite shared exposure to environmental risk, some adolescents report low to no substance use. Guided by the adverse community experiences and resilience framework, this study identified classes of neighborhood risk and substance use among urban adolescents and examined whether emotional, behavioral, community, and demographic factors differentiated profile membership. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 743 adolescents aged 13-21 residing in a large Northeastern U.S. city. Five dichotomous indicators (witnessed neighborhood violence, seen drugs sold in their neighborhood, and lifetime vaping, alcohol, and marijuana use) were analyzed using latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between class membership and emotional, behavioral, community, and demographic factors. RESULTS: A three-class solution was retained: No Neighborhood Risk Exposure/Low or No Substance Use (34%), High Exposure/Low or No Use (40%), and High Exposure/Polysubstance Use (26%). Compared with the High Exposure/Low or No Use class, the No Neighborhood Risk Exposure/Low or No Use class reported higher neighborhood support and lower racial discrimination, missing school, and suicidal thoughts. The High Exposure/Polysubstance Use class differed from the High Exposure/Low or No Use class primarily by higher depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Low substance use should not be interpreted as low need among adolescents exposed to neighborhood risk. Adolescent health and well-being efforts should assess mental health distress, suicidal ideation, racial discrimination-related experiences, and school disengagement alongside substance use.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.