West Virginia ED screens show fentanyl often missed by traditional opiate tests

Urine drug screen co-positivity and the fentanyl testing gap among adult psychiatric emergency department encounters in West Virginia: a cross-sectional analysis.

Journal of addictive diseases β€’ β€’ Moderately Relevant
πŸ€–

AI Summary

This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined clinician-directed urine drug screens from 1,091 adult psychiatric emergency department encounters at two West Virginia hospitals between October 2020 and December 2024. Its primary focus was screening patterns, including how often fentanyl and amphetamine/methamphetamine screens were both positive and whether traditional opiate screens detected fentanyl-positive results. Among encounters tested for each substance, THC was positive in 214 of 513 (41.7%), amphetamine/methamphetamine in 203 of 509 (39.9%), and fentanyl in 146 of 519 (28.1%).

In a selected group tested for both fentanyl and amphetamine/methamphetamine, 81 of 108 fentanyl-positive encounters (75.0%) were also amphetamine/methamphetamine-positive; amphetamine/methamphetamine positivity was associated with fentanyl positivity. Among fentanyl-positive encounters also given the traditional opiate assay, 91 of 118 (77.1%) had a negative opiate screen, illustrating the testing gap described by the authors. These are presumptive screening results, not confirmed drug exposure. Testing was nonprotocolized and clinician-directed, so the study cannot establish population prevalence or causation; this is an abstract-based summary, not a review of the full text.

πŸ’‘ Key Findings

1
Among tested encounters, THC screens were positive in 214 of 513 (41.7%); testing was clinician-directed.
High
95%
2
Among fentanyl-positive encounters co-tested for amphetamine/methamphetamine, 81 of 108 (75.0%) also screened positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine; this co-positivity was an association, not evidence of causation.
High
95%
3
Among fentanyl-positive encounters also tested with a traditional opiate assay, 91 of 118 (77.1%) had a negative opiate screen.
High
95%
4
In complete-panel encounters, 128 of 281 (45.6%) screened positive for at least two core drug classes.
High
95%

πŸ“„ Original Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional opiate immunoassays do not reliably detect fentanyl, and patterns of presumptive drug co-positivity in psychiatric emergency care remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: To describe class-specific urine drug screen positivity, quantify co-positivity among explicitly co-tested encounters, and assess the fentanyl testing gap among adult psychiatric emergency department encounters at two hospitals in West Virginia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,091 adult psychiatric emergency department encounters at two West Virginia hospitals from October 2020 through December 2024. Testing was clinician-directed. Class-specific estimates used only encounters tested for each class. Six-core-class co-positivity was assessed among 281 complete-panel encounters; complete and incomplete panels were compared. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated fentanyl and amphetamine/methamphetamine co-positivity among 350 co-tested encounters. RESULTS: Among tested encounters, tetrahydrocannabinol was positive in 214 of 513 (41.7%), amphetamine/methamphetamine in 203 of 509 (39.9%), and fentanyl in 146 of 519 (28.1%). Among complete-panel encounters, 128 of 281 (45.6%) were positive for at least two core classes. Substance-related chief complaints were more common among complete-panel encounters than among incomplete-panel encounters (73.3% versus 56.8%; p < .001). Among fentanyl-positive encounters co-tested for amphetamine/methamphetamine, 81 of 108 (75.0%) were also positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine. Amphetamine/methamphetamine positivity was associated with fentanyl positivity (adjusted odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 4.8-14.9). Among 118 fentanyl-positive encounters co-tested using the traditional opiate assay, 91 (77.1%) were opiate-screen-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl and amphetamine/methamphetamine screens frequently overlapped in clinically selected subsets, and traditional opiate screening missed most fentanyl-positive screens. Psychiatric emergency services in fentanyl-affected regions should evaluate fentanyl-specific testing. Because immunoassays were presumptive and testing was nonprotocolized, findings represent screening yield, not confirmed exposure or population prevalence.

Explore More Research

Stay informed about the latest cannabis science.

Your stash, decoded.